Health inequalities and the NHS

Many speeches have been given to mark 70 years of the NHS. They have rightly celebrated the considerable achievements of this much-loved institution. Few though have mentioned the origins of the NHS in the Welsh valleys. It was the experiences of those here, unable to afford access to doctors and medicine, which shaped the vision for today’s NHS.

In 1915, the Tredegar Workmen’s Medical Aid Society was set up by, and for, the people of Tredegar, a mining community in South Wales. The people of Tredegar were pioneers. What they did went beyond anything that had gone before. They provided the inspiration for Aneurin Bevan, a local MP, who as Secretary of State for Health went on to design the new national health service in the same fashion.

It’s often repeated that the NHS is a ‘religion’ for the British people. The fundamental belief underpinning it, common to young and old, is in free health care for all. I believe this is because we have a visceral memory of the suffering and cruelty people experienced before the health service was founded. And a memory that, of all the public services we enjoy today, the NHS is ours because we designed it.

National Helth Service

The impact of the NHS on the nation’s health has been transformational. Decade after decade, life expectancy and health outcomes across the board have improved. Something created by a community with relatively little has benefited everyone, including the middle classes and the wealthy.

And yet today this situation is in danger of being reversed, with the primary benefit for the better off and the poor being left behind. In the 10 years since the publication of The Marmot Review, health inequalities appear to be widening. Shifting trends in life expectancy, and a widening gap between rich and poor, are of deep concern. Recent data published by the ONS indicates that, for those living in Herefordshire, the average disability-free life expectancy is 71 years. However, if you live in Tower Hamlets in East London, your disability-free life expectancy is 55 years. Unless the NHS makes a significant investment in preventive services, the gap between rich and poor will likely continue to grow.

In his speech to NHS Expo 2018, Simon Stevens referenced the twin needs to work towards narrowing the life-expectancy gap and to measure the impact of NHS services on reducing this divide. Not only is there a huge injustice happening here but it’s also costing us all a lot of money. The cost to the NHS of failing to provide comprehensive preventive services to people living in poor communities is huge – £4.8 billion a year according to York University’s Centre for Health Economics.

One response is the idea that people should ‘take responsibility for their own health’. This is part of what preventive services are about. But without explicit reference to the relationship between poverty and poor health, there’s a risk that this will become a political slogan that undermines and marginalises people living in poverty. Dr Andy Knox wrote an insightful blog recently about involving communities in the design and delivery of services to tackle health inequalities in Morecambe Bay. He rightly reflected that improving health and wellbeing is far easier for some individuals and communities than for others.

On a recent visit to Turning Point’s integrated healthy lifestyles and Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) service in Luton, Total Wellbeing, I was impressed by the team’s work. This service is supporting people to learn new skills and motivating them to make changes to their lifestyle, keeping people out of hospital. Services like these – treating people holistically and recognising the impact of the wider determinants of health and the relationship between mental and physical wellbeing – can genuinely empower people to take responsibility for their own health.

It’s my belief that we are failing to shift resources towards prevention because the NHS is no longer run by, and for, the people. Our national health service is highly complex and in so many ways so much more sophisticated than it was in 1945. But, communities are no longer involved in the design and oversight of bespoke local health services as they were with the Tredegar Workmen’s Medical Aid Society. There are some pockets of good practice in terms of community involvement but mostly this is tokenistic, under-resourced and unable to make much impact on how services are delivered. When it’s done well, community involvement takes time, effort and resources – but will pay dividends by enabling services to work more effectively in the longer term.

One good example is Turning Point’s Connected Care model, which provides skills for local people to work alongside commissioners to redesign health and social care services and test new ways of working. Across the country we trained 250,000 local people, including by sharing information about health inequalities facing the local community. Our experience of applying this approach in diverse communities across the country is that people want to get involved in the design and delivery of preventive services. Sadly, this and other similar approaches such as those documented in Public Health England’s A guide to community-centred approaches for health and wellbeing are simply not incentivised in a system that continues to reward hospitals for treating people rather than keeping them healthy.

We need to learn or re-learn the lesson that the creation of the NHS teaches us: the NHS cannot be imposed on people but must be developed with them – and it has to change with them too. In my mind, devolved health and social care budgets, overseen by democratically elected representatives as in Greater Manchester, provide the greatest potential to make this a reality. There’s a long way to go but this is how we will ensure that local people are involved in the design and delivery of local services that genuinely meet their needs. We need services like the Tredegar Workmen’s Medical Aid Society – services run by, and for, the people.

Source: Lord Victor Adebowale writing at The King’s Fund

‘The era of austerity is finally coming to an end’. Really?

In his first Autumn Budget, Chancellor Philip Hammond claimed his party’s management of the public finances was working and would allow future investment in public services – hinting at a reversal of the spending cuts to government departments that have been the norm since 2010, and a new approach from 2019. But with Brexit in the way, does it add up? 

Significantly, the Budget didn’t provide many answers on the urgent question of local authority finance – any big reform will have to wait until next year at least, and potentially after the Brexit issue is more settled. In the meantime, many services are under huge pressure, with demand spilling over onto charity services and beneficiaries.

Hammond addressed the social care crisis hitting local government and the health service with a range of funding streams amounting to nearly £1bn into 2019, but many analysts will consider this far below what is required even in the short term. The Chancellor also said the government would ‘shortly’ publish a Green Paper on social care – but virtually the same promise was made this time last year. Without sorting out both, claims about the end of austerity still ring hollow for many. 

On the other hand, the Chancellor did make significant (and anticipated) announcements about Universal Credit, which many charities (including food banks like the Trussell Trust) have criticised. Calling it a ‘major structural reform to our economy that will help drive growth in the years ahead’, he announced an additional £1bn over five years to support ‘additional protections’ as people move to Universal Credit, as well as policy changes that would cost another £1.7bn, intended to benefit 2.4m working families with children and people with disabilities. He said further detailed measures from the Department for Work and Pensions would be forthcoming – whether this is enough to fix the problems will surely depend on those.

Hammond also re-announced the Government’s already trumpeted real terms £20.5bn increase for NHS spending over the next five years. He said the NHS will need to produce a 10-year plan, to be ‘published shortly’, and announced that there would be a new mental health crisis service, with comprehensive support available in all A&Es, enhanced support for children and young people, and a crisis hotline. 

For charities specifically, there were some familiar giveaways for charities involving people in uniform, such as £10m for Air Ambulances, and £10m to benefit Armed Forces Charities in the centenary year of the armistice at the end of the First World War. There were also some technical, tax-related measures around charity trading and Gift Aid. However, many other policy areas important to many charities, such as a planned UK Shared Prosperity Fund (to replace EU funding streams after Brexit), and the future of the Charity Commission’s budget, got no mention.

Commenting on the Chancellor’s statement, DSC’s Director of Policy and Research Jay Kennedy said: ‘Despite new measures on Universal Credit and another social care funding stop gap, the claim of the end of austerity rings hollow. The Chancellor made big statements about mental health provision that many charities will want to unpack, because they’ve heard similar things many times before.’ 

‘The clock is ticking down to our departure from the EU and there was no new news on a consultation about the future UK Shared Prosperity Fund, or the potential development of the Dormant Assets scheme to support community resilience. We may have to wait until the Spending Review to get more certainty about the Charity Commission’s budget’.

‘Critically, local authority finance remains in limbo, which means continued chaos on the ground for local charities in their relationship with local government, as demand for many services continues to increase. Much still depends on the outcome of the Brexit negotiations and the planned Spending Review next year. Time will tell whether this Budget is worth the paper it’s written on.’ 

For more information please contact Daniel Ferrell-Schweppenstedde, Directory of Social Change by email (dferrell@dsc.org.uk) or phone (020 7697 4293, 07932 072 597). 

Notes to editors:

• Founded in 1974, the Directory of Social Change (DSC) is a national charity which supports an independent voluntary sector through campaigning, training and publications. DSC is the largest supplier of information and training to the voluntary sector, and its work helps tens of thousands of organisations every year achieve their aims. Learn more at www.dsc.org.uk